Aave vs Compound: A Deep Dive into DeFi Lending Titans

Aave vs Compound

Last Updated on September 7, 2025 by Olga Davis


Key Takeaways on Aave vs Compound

  • Aave and Compound are DeFi lending protocols on Ethereum, using smart contracts to automate loans and yields, with Aave (2020) focusing on innovation and Compound (2018) on simplicity.
  • Aave’s flash loans enable instant, uncollateralized borrowing, while Compound uses cTokens for straightforward, composable lending.
  • Aave’s rates are volatile but high-yield, unlike Compound’s predictable, generally lower rates.
  • Aave supports 20+ assets across 14 chains with $40B TVL, outpacing Compound’s Ethereum-focused $2–3B TVL and limited assets.





Aave vs Compound: Introduction to DeFi Lending Protocols

Aave and Compound democratize access to money by enabling anybody to obtain crypto loans or earn yields. These platforms, which were born out of the Ethereum boom of 2017–2018, use smart contracts to automate interest rates depending on supply and demand, doing away with banks and their expensive fees. Compound, which made its debut in 2018, places more emphasis on predictability and simplicity than Aave, which was introduced in 2020 as a development of ETHLend and promotes creativity and adaptability.

Both protocols flourish on multi-chain deployments in 2025, when Ethereum’s Dencun upgrade lowers gas expenses and layer-2 scaling. Although Compound’s TVL is $2–3 billion, Aave’s is $40 billion, indicating wider usage. In fact, Aave recently reached a TVL record of $41.1 billion, making it equivalent in size to the 54th largest bank in the US. The reason? Mostly Aave’s aggressive feature launch and Compound’s cautious strategy are the causes of this discrepancy. In 2025, Aave vs Compound is mostly about sophisticated traders looking for arbitrage chances versus conservative lenders seeking steady profits.




Aave vs Compound


What is Aave and Its Core Features

Aave is an open-source liquidity protocol that allows users to provide assets for lending or to borrow against collateral. It functions fundamentally as a network of loan pools with real-time rate fluctuations, where suppliers provide liquidity and borrowers take it out. The protocol supports a diverse range of assets like ETH, USDT, DAI, ChainLink, Wrapped BTC, Kyber, and Synthetix.


Core Aave features include:


Flash Loans

Flash loans are a unique feature of Aave that allow you to borrow money without requiring any collateral, such as locking up your cryptocurrency as security. The catch? You must repay the loan within the same blockchain transaction, which happens in seconds. Imagine taking out a $10,000 loan, spending it for a brief trade, and then repaying it right away. Flash loans are great for advanced moves like arbitrage (buying a crypto cheap on one platform and selling it for a profit on another). Despite driving billions of dollars in DeFi activity since their inception, flash loans are most effective for tech-savvy traders who know how to set up these quick trades.


Interest Rate Options

Aave provides a variety of interest rate options. While its stable rates minimize fluctuations and offer consistent returns (e.g., 5-7% on USDC), making it ideal for cautious users, variable rates adjust to market demand are also available (e.g., up to 10% on ETH during periods of high activity), offering greater potential rewards for those who are willing to embrace market swings.


Wide Asset Support

More than twenty ERC-20 tokens are distributed across multiple EVM-compatible chains, including Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, and others, with stablecoins like USDC, USDT, and Aave’s own GHO stablecoin, launched in 2023. It is Aave’s native stablecoin, which users can borrow by providing other crypto assets as overcollateralized backing. This means that GHO is minted only when sufficient collateral is supplied, ensuring the loan is fully secured. Currently, $350 million has been minted and overcollateralized.


Governance via AAVE Tokens

AAVE tokens (current supply ~16M, price ~$317 as of September 2025) provide voting rights and staking incentives through the Safety Module, supporting protocol security and community governance. AAVE market capitalization is around $4.8 billion. With large participation rates, holders have an impact on risk parameters, asset listings, and decisions on protocol upgrades or emergency measures.


Aave vs Compound

Aave governance at work: sample proposals and voting results.
Source: app.aave.com/governance


Explore our educational resources and stay informed. From Coinbase vs Binance and Tether crypto to crypto ETFs, best small business loans, and the best crypto loan sites, our expert guides help you make smarter financial decisions.





Aave vs Compound


What is Compound and Its Core Features

Compound, which is frequently called the “original” DeFi lending platform, works as an algorithmic money market where users deposit assets to get cTokens, which are ERC-20 tokens that automatically earn interest. The platform’s asset pool includes ETH, USDC, DAI, Wrapped BTC (an Ethereum token pegged to Bitcoin), ChainLink, Yearn.Finance, Ox and SushiToken.


Core Compound features include:


cToken System

When you deposit assets like ETH, USDC, or DAI into Compound, they are converted into cTokens (e.g., cETH, cUSDC), which accrue interest automatically, can be used as collateral in other DeFi protocols, or can be traded or redeemed at any time, enhancing system composability.


Algorithmic Interest Rates

Interest rates are calculated with formulas that respond to supply and demand, ensuring rates adjust automatically for borrowers and lenders without manual intervention.


Limited but Focused Assets

ETH, USDC, DAI, and WBTC are the main supported tokens, with an emphasis on stablecoins to reduce volatility and keep lending and borrowing predictable.


Governance via COMP Tokens

Holders cast votes on proposals, and participation is encouraged by liquidity mining rewards (via COMP dividends). In Compound ecosystem, COMP (9.45M circulating, price ~$43) facilitates suggestions; its current market capitalization is approximately $400M. Although billions have been disbursed through liquidity mining, declining momentum is reflected in reduced TVL, as well as fewer new participants entering the ecosystem.




Aave vs Compound


A Quick Look at Security & Risk Management

Aave takes a number of steps to improve Ethereum V3 security. Comprehensive code review is ensured by frequent audits by companies such as Trail of Bits and OpenZeppelin. The Safety Module, which is financed by staked AAVE, protects against any losses and has been upgraded with the Aave Umbrella system to provide decentralized insurance coverage for protocol shortfalls. E-mode and flash loan atomicity are two features that lower the danger of attack and liquidation by optimizing collateral efficiency and ensuring transaction integrity. But risks like oracle manipulation, smart contract flaws, and even cross-chain bridge vulnerabilities still exist, particularly as Aave grows into layer-2 solutions. In order to be safe, users should use multi-sig wallets, enable two-factor authentication (2FA) on related accounts, and keep an eye on Aave’s governance proposals for up-to-date information on protocol modifications.

Compound undergoes audits too, though less frequently than Aave. Because to Compound’s cautious approach to updates and strong timelock protections, no significant 2025 hacks have occurred. However, users must maintain strong security procedures and be on guard against phishing and other persistent threats, as well as less frequent audits.


Aave and Compound’s decentralized nature offers transparency, but this comes with significant risks. If something goes wrong, there is no bank or hotline to call, and no one is available to fix a hacked wallet or a broken smart contract. When it comes to complex coding errors, sophisticated exploits, or sudden market swings, you’re on your own. Stay vigilant, thoroughly research protocols, and recognize that DeFi’s openness does not shield you from its heightened risks.




Pros and Cons of Aave

Aave Pros

  • Flash Loans. Aave’s flash loans have revolutionized DeFi composability by enabling $10B+ in volume and opening access to capital without upfront collateral. Overcollateralized yields are provided by its natively integrating GHO stablecoin, which also creates new opportunities for stablecoin-based liquidity provision.
  • Variable and Stable Interest Rates. Users can choose between market-driven variable rates or slightly higher stable rates that protect against volatility.
  • Diverse Collateral. Supports over 20 ERC-20 tokens across 14+ chains, including USDC, USDT, and its native GHO stablecoin. This appeals to users with diverse portfolios.
  • Gas Optimizations. Aave V3 introduced significant gas savings, improving cost-efficiency compared to earlier iterations.
  • Safety Module. Staked AAVE offers governance authority, yield incentives, and a buffer against deficits.
  • Multi-Chain Expansion. Available on Ethereum, Polygon, Optimism, Avalanche, Fantom, and more, reinforcing its interoperability.


Aave Cons

  • Learning Curve. Flash loans and e-mode require technical understanding, making Aave less beginner-friendly.
  • Volatility Risks. Over-reliance on altcoins raises the danger of liquidation in contrast to reliable collateral like Bitcoin or Ethereum.
  • Gas Fees on Ethereum. Because of Ethereum network congestion, transactions are still costly in bull markets even after optimizations.
  • No Native Bitcoin Support. Wrapped Bitcoin is required for users, which increases technical risks.




Pros and Cons of Compound

Compound Pros

  • Algorithmic Interest Rates. Utilization ratios are used to calculate rates, guaranteeing uniformity and openness.
  • Steady Yields. Especially appealing to organizations looking for steady, low-risk revenue sources.
  • Governance via COMP. Token holders maintain a high level of transparency in governance by proposing and voting on protocol changes.
  • Liquidity Mining. Lenders and borrowers receive rewards that promote involvement.
  • cTokens. Deposits are converted into interest-bearing cTokens that can be pledged as collateral throughout DeFi.
  • Instant Withdrawals. Strong liquidity is ensured by users’ ability to redeem assets instantly at any moment.


Compound Cons

  • Narrower Asset Support. Fewer collateral types compared to Aave, restricting portfolio diversification.
  • Restricted Market Presence. Primarily Ethereum-focused with less multi-chain expansion.
  • Complex Governance. Active participation in governance requires technical knowledge and continuous monitoring.
  • Slower Innovation. By prioritizing stability, Compound has fallen behind Aave in launching new features (e.g., no flash loans).
  • Fewer Audits. Compared to Aave, Compound’s audit frequency has been lower.
Aave vs Compound


Aave vs Compound: Summary Table


AspectAaveCompound
BackgroundLaunched 2020 (from ETHLend); innovative, multi-chain. TVL: $30–40B (record $41.1B). Suits traders seeking arbitrage.Launched 2018; simple, predictable. TVL: $2–3B. Suits conservative lenders.
Core FunctionalityNon-custodial lending/borrowing via liquidity pools; real-time rate fluctuations.Algorithmic money market; users get cTokens for interest; overcollateralized borrowing.
Key Features1) Flash Loans: uncollateralized, repaid in same transaction.
2) Rates: variable (up to 10% ETH) or stable (5-7% USDC).
3) Assets: 20+ tokens, 14 EVM chains; GHO stablecoin ($350M minted, overcollateralized).
4) Governance: AAVE token voting (AIPs).
1) cTokens (e.g., cETH, cUSDC): accrue interest, composable as collateral.
2) Rates: algorithmic, supply/demand-based.
3) Assets: ETH, USDC, DAI, WBTC.
4) Governance: COMP token voting, liquidity mining.
Interest RatesVariable; stable 1-2% higher. High volatility; for yield seekers.Algorithmic, predictable. Low volatility; for risk-averse lenders.
Assets ETH, USDT, DAI, ChainLink, Wrapped BTC, Kyber, Synthetix etcETH, USDC, DAI, Wrapped BTC, ChainLink, Yearn.Finance etc
InnovationsFlash loans; GHO stablecoin; rate curve updates. Advanced tools for institutions/DeFi.cTokens; liquidity mining; faster 2025 proposals. No flash loans; less complex.
Governance & TokenomicsAAVE: ~15.2M supply, ~$302–$317 (market cap ~$4.6–$4.8B). Staking (2–5% APY), fee shares; high engagement.COMP: 9.45M supply, ~$42–$43 (market cap ~$410M). Rewards via mining.
SecurityAudited (e.g., Trail of Bits); no major exploits since 2020 (minor 2024/2025 incidents mitigated). Safety Module, e-mode, flash loan protections. Oracle/contract risks remain.Less frequently audited; no major exploits since 2020 (minor incidents mitigated). Timelocks. Oracle/contract risks remain.
ProsFlash loans, flexible rates/assets, strong governance, multi-chain expansion, Safety Module.Simple interface, cToken composability, predictable rates, liquidity mining.
ConsComplex learning curve, volatile rates, Ethereum gas fees, no native BTC support.No flash loans, fewer assets, lower yields in bull markets, slower innovation, fewer audits.




How To Get Started with Crypto Lending?

For new users, deciding between Aave and Compound might be difficult. While Compound offers a more straightforward and consistent experience, Aave offers more sophisticated option with flash loans and adjustable rates. At the same time, centralized (CeFi) сrypto lending platform may be a simpler way for novices to start the crypto journey without having to deal with the intricacies of DeFi.

CoinRabbit offers an accessible entry into crypto lending, allowing to borrow against crypto without selling your portfolio. Its intuitive design simplifies the process for beginners, and once you’re comfortable, you can explore Aave’s advanced features or Compound’s steady returns to level up your DeFi game.


Aave vs Compound


Here’s why CoinRabbit stands out for newcomers:

  • Straightforward process: deposit collateral and get funds in minutes with no complicated setup.
  • Supports 300+ Cryptos As Collateral: use BTC, ETH, hundred of altcoins.
  • No Credit Checks Or Verification: you can get funds without traditional bank checks, credit scores, or lengthy approval processes. The platform relies solely on your crypto collateral.
  • Flexible Repayments: pay back whenever suits you, with no fixed schedules for open-ended loans.
  • All-In-One Platform: store, swap, borrow and lend in one place, without setting up a complex Web3 wallet.






Disclaimer
The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry a high level of risk, and it is essential to conduct thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any financial institution or organization. We do not take responsibility for the platforms we recommend. Always invest responsibly and consider your individual financial situation before making investment choices.



  • Reviewed by:

    Dan is a crypto enthusiast with a background in traditional finance. Focused on accuracy and clarity, he helps make complex crypto topics accessible and trustworthy. His keen eye for detail and practical approach ensure that the information cuts through the noise and delivers real value.